Home
Local Services
Yard Sales
Water Issues
Lost and Found Pets
Links Page
Fire
SKNA Officers
Contact Information

 

 

 

==========================

Update on the Water Issues in Sandia Knolls

 

 

There are three different regulatory agencies in the water issues:

            Public Regulation Commission (PRC) regulates utilities --- pipes, pumps, service

            Office of the State Engineer (OSE) regulates water ---- wells, water rights and how water can be used

            Town of Edgewood regulates the subdivision itself ----- lots sizes, design of the subdivision, roads, wastewater systems, etc.

                        because Campbell has been annexed to Edgewood

 

 

Brief Summary

PRC - will hear the NM Water Services application to serve Campbell Ranch in January, even though Campbell Ranch's contract with NM Water services has been cancelled.  SKNA is part of that hearing, and particularly concerned that there are enough water rights maintained to serve all customers (built and vacant lots) in the service area.  

 

OSE - Aquifer Sciences, a water developer, has contracted to drill an exploratory well on Campbell land and applied for 1500 acre feet of water rights.  There are about 230 protestants to their application, which will be adjudicated using OSE's usual process.  There is no PRC application yet, for the utility system to use Aquifer Sciences water in Campbell Ranch.     

 

Edgewood - The Planning and Zoning Commission will hear Campbell's application for approval to extent its Preliminary Plat for another 2 years on October 5th.  The application will include Aquifer Sciences as the water provider.   

 

For those of you who want more details: 

Recent news of New Mexico Water Service's application to PRC to use water rights to serve Campbell Ranch

 

In 2008, NM Water Service Corporation notified the Public Regulation Commission (PRC), which regulates utilities, that it would extend service into Campbell Ranch using water rights that now used to serve Sandia Knolls and surrounding areas.  Sandia Knolls Neighborhood Association (SKNA) protested that application and there have been numerous briefs filed.  SKNA's primary concern  was that NM Water Services Company did not have enough water rights to serve all existing customers, potential new customers with undeveloped lots in NM Water Services's service area, and also extend services to an additional 750 homes in Campbell Ranch (about tripling the number of homes served with the same water rights).   NM Water Services maintained that it would benefit Sandia Knolls to have more customers sharing the costs of upgrading the system.  

 

In August 2009, Campbell Ranch cancelled its contract with NM Water Services Company.  NM Water Services notified the PRC that it was withdrawing its application to extend service into Campbell Ranch, because it no longer had a contract with Campbell Ranch.  But the PRC did not agree to let NM Water Services withdraw.  The Commission said this is the second time this issue has come up, and that the briefs already filed had raised significant public interest issues which deserved to be addressed.  In particular, NM Water Services had maintained in its brief that it only had to serve customers on a first come first serve basis.  This means that NM Water Services would be obligated to serve customers in the order they signed up and if NM Water Services used up the water rights it owned, it could possibly deny service to later customers in its service area.  This could potentially mean than vacant lots in Sandia Knolls, which now can expect to be served, might not be able to get service from NM Water Services.  We expect that the PRC will address this and other issues at the scheduled January 2010 hearing.  

 

Recent news of the OSE applications

In 2008, NM Water Services also applied to the OSE to expand its area of use for its water into Campbell Ranch.  While the PRC (above) regulates utilities, NM Water Services needed OSE approval to use the water for Campbell Ranch.  SKNA and many individuals protested the OSE application.  And when Campbell cancelled their contract with NM Water Services, NM Water Services in turn withdrew its application to the OSE.  The OSE (unlike the PRC) let them withdraw their application.  

 

Campbell Ranch still needs water, so it has an agreement with Aquifer Sciences, a California/Nevada water development company, to develop water on Campbell Ranch.  There is some talk that Campbell Ranch would have first rights to the water they find, and then other water could be sold to other parties.  In August 2009, Aquifer Sciences filed an application with the OSE to drill first an exploratory well, and to use 1500 acre feet of water rights.  This is the big well drilling rig that you can see about a mile north of Frost, east on North 14.  It is drilling an exploratory well.  Presumably, Aquifer Sciences will use the data it gets from this well in its OSE application.  

 

There are roughly 230 protestants to this OSE application, including people who live in Sandia Knolls.

 

No one knows how much water is really in the aquifer, or how the underground rocks and faults all fit together.  So this will be one piece of important information to  answer the question of how much water is down there, although it may not address how the water flows.  The other question is whether new water rights should be granted, since many other people already have water rights in the Sandia Basin.  The OSE will have to determine if there are enough water rights "left" to support this new withdrawal of water.  Since Bernalillo County has documented that water levels in this part of the Basin have been dropping, this decision may impact many people in the community.  Based on very rough calculations of the population in the area and water use, 1500 acre feet of water may be about a doubling of the current withdrawals from the aquifer.  

 

SKNA wants to make sure that there is enough wet water in the aquifer to serve the current community (of which Sandia Knolls is just a small part) before water rights are approved for a commercial water developer.   

 

Recent new of Campbell Ranch's application to the Town of Edgewood's for Approval of its Preliminary Plat

A preliminary plat lays out the outline of a subdivision - roads, main areas of development, etc.  The Town of Edgewood annexed Campbell Ranch in 2001, so it has jurisdiction in this case.   Edgewood approved Campbell Ranch's Preliminary Plat in December 2007, based water from NM Water Services.  SKNA appealed this approval, but lost.  Since Preliminary Plats are only good for 12 months, Campbell Ranch applied to Edgewood for a 2-year extension.  Edgewood's Planning and Zoning Commission did not approve this extension, so Campbell Ranch appealed to the full Town Council.  Then, when Campbell Ranch changed water sources (cancelled the contract with NM Water Services and partnered with Aquifer Sciences) the Town Council decided to send the issue back to the Planning and Zoning Commission for a new decision.    

 

Which brings us to the October 5th meeting of the Edgewood  Planning and Zoning Commission.  The Commission will rehear Campbell Ranch's application for a 2-year extension of their Preliminary Plat.  If the extension is approved, Campbell can continue with its development plans, and will have to still get approval from the PRC for the utility aspects of its water system and from the OSE for water.  If the Edgewood Planning and Zoning Commission does not approve the extension, Campbell can re-apply for approval of its Preliminary Plat when it is ready.

 

 

 

 


From the Mountain View Telegraph

Water Line Annex Halted PDF Print E-mail
Written by Lee Ross   
Thursday, 23 July 2009 09:54
New Mexico Water Service Co. has terminated a request to extend its water line into Campbell Ranch, according to Public Regulation Commission document.

 

The water line extension was proposed from Sandia Knolls subdivision and was part of the evidence for the original approval of Campbell Ranch's preliminary plat, which was granted by the town of Edgewood after going through several appeals.

Campbell Ranch, an 8,000-acre master-planned community east of N.M. 14 and north of Frost Road. The whole area was annexed by the town of Edgewood in 2001, and a preliminary plat for the first 92-home section of the development was approved by the Edgewood Town Council in March 2008 and was set to expire in March of this year.

Foreseeing delays in moving forward on the development, David Campbell, an attorney representing Campbell Corp., appeared before the Edgewood Planning and Zoning Commission several times requesting an extension of the preliminary plat and had the request tabled each time, until March 16, when the commission voted not to extend the time frame for the plat.

That decision was appealed and is scheduled to come before the Edgewood Town Council for a public hearing on Aug 5.

The termination of Campbell Corp.'s agreement with New Mexico Water Service Co. could condense that hearing, which would normally be quite involved, into a relatively simple matter.

Throughout the appeals and requests for plat approval, it was the agreement between Campbell and the water company that was used as evidence that the development was ready for preliminary plat approval.

According to town regulations, developments should have a source of water before being granted plat approval.

It may not be so simple, however.

Campbell's efforts to obtain water for the development seem to be continuing, but in a different direction.

There is currently an application by another company, Aquifer Science LLC out of Nevada, before the Office of the State Engineer to drill wells on Campbell Farming Corp. property and divert up to 1,500 acre-feet of water.

Some property owners from the nearby area, including residents of Sandia Knolls, have submitted protest letters, according to a series of e-mails sent out about the issue.

 

 

 

 

 
   
   

7-14-08 Letter from Paul Risso NMWSCo.

 

Good afternoon everyone.  As you know from my previous emails, New Mexico Water Service Company has made filings with both the  Public Regulation Commission (NMPRC) and the State Engineer's Office relative to it's Sandia Knolls water system.  
 
Now that the process is underway at the NMPRC and a case has been docketed (No. 08-00177-UT), if you wish to stay abreast of the proceedings you may do so by registering on the NMPRC website. 
 
Below is a link that will take you to the NMPRC website.  Once there click on the box titled "PRC Case Dockets" and follow the instructions from there.  I have attached the latest documents related to that filing.
 
 
I will continue to keep you apprised as to our filing with the State Engineer's Office.
 
Have a nice weekend.
 
Paul Risso
New Mexico Water Service Company
 

PRC. Order Rescheduling Pre-Hearing Conference (7-30-08) (W0848669).PDF

 

PRC. Motion to Reschedule Pre-Hearing Conference (Endorsed) (W0848659).PDF

 

 

 

Recent Changes in the Regulatory Cases Involving our Water company


 
May, 2009 update

 
There are three regulatory cases which impact NM water Services Company and teh water it provides to Sandia Knolls and other customers.  What follows is a summary of the recent events.

 
Campbell's application to Edgewood Planning and Zoning for Preliminary Plat Approval.  Campbell Ranch applied to Edgewood in December 2007 for preliminary plat approval to develop Campbell Ranch.   Campbell has a contract with NM Water Services company (which serves Sandia Knolls) to provide water to Campbell Ranch with the water rights now used to serve current customers.  Edgewood approved the preliminary plat until March 2009.  In March, Campbell applied to Edgewood for an extension of that preliminary plat, and the Edgewood Planning and Zoning Commission did not approve the extension.  Campbell has appealed the ruling to the Edgewood Town Council.  The appeal will be heard by the Town Council on June 3 at 6:00 at the Edgewood community Center (just east of the Dairy Queen on the north interstate frontage road).  The public is welcome and Sandia Knolls will have representatives attending this meeting.      

 
NM Water Service Company's application to the Public Regulation Commission.  NMWSC applied to the PRC for approval to extend the current Sandia Knolls water system infrastructure into Campbell Ranch.  The PRC regulates utility rates and infrastructure.  Sandia Knolls is an intervener in this case, because we are concerned with the impact this large extension will have on the old  water pipes and other infrastructure that serves the Knolls.  We are also concerned about the impact of such a large expansion on our rates, and the draw-down on the aquifer with increased pumping.  We are concerned that NMWSC's "first come first serve" practice would mean that NMWSC might not have enough water rights to serve landowners with vacant land in NMWSC's service area in the future.  NMWSC argues that this extension would provide the current users with another well and a large water storage tank.  This case has been going on for about a year, with NMWSC, the State, and interveners participating by submitting briefs and motions.  The hearing, after which the Hearing Officer will make a recommendation to the PRC Commission, was recently re-scheduled for late August.  

 
NM Water Service Company's application to the Office of the State Engineer.  NMWSC has also applied to the OSE for permission to use its current water rights to supply Campbell Ranch in addition to the current service area.  The OSE regulates the use of water in the State.  A long-scheduled hearing was scheduled for May 2009, but NMWSC moved to vacate the hearing at the last minute.  The OSE has requested a status update in August, 2009.  Sandia Knolls residents are also participating in this case.  We are concerned that increased water used by Campbell will deplete the aquifer faster than the already declining levels with current use.  We are also concerned that adding a new well with unknown water quality may reduce our water quality and cause havoc with the aging pipes which run through the Knolls.  

 
The Sandia Knolls Neighborhood Association water group appreciates your support at the last SKNA meeting.  This is an expensive process, since SKNA must get legal help to be effective.  A donation to SKNA to support this work would be greatly appreciated.  Donations can be sent to SKNA Treasurer, Sue Neustel, 6 Longview, Sandia Park.   If you have questions or comments, the water group wants to hear them.  Please call Janet Winchester-Silbaugh (321-1581).

 

Petition for Declaratory Order  pdf file.

 

May 1st 2008

THANK YOU TO EVERYONE WHO HELPED WITH THE WATER DECISION IN 2006!!!  Those

6-4-08

 

 

 

 

Yesterday afternoon New Mexico Water Service Company filed a Petition for Declaratory Order with the New Mexico Public Regulation Commission, to address the meaning and intent of the Final Order entered by the Commission on May 23, 2006 in Case No. 05-00208 UT and Case No. 05-00305 UT consolidated  ("Final Order" or "Order").   I have attached that complete filing for your information, and for posting on the Sandia Knolls website.

 

 

 

 

 
nmwsc/PRC. Affidavit of Paul Risso (W0834716).PDF
nmwsc/PRC. Brief in Support of Petition for Declaratory Order (W0834827).PDF
nmwsc/PRC. Exhibit A to Brief (W0834725).PDF
nmwsc/PRC. Exhibit B to Brief (W0834722).PDF
nmwsc/PRC. Exhibit C to Brief (W0834719).PDF
nmwsc/PRC. Exhibit D to Brief (W0834717).PDF
nmwsc/PRC. Petition for Declaratory Order (08-00177-UT) (W0834838).PDF

 

5-24-08

 

Meeting information presented by the New Mexico Water Services Representative on May 20, 2008.

New Mexico Water Service Company - Sandia Knolls Presentation 5-08 [Compatibility Mode].pdf

 

Campbell Ranch Ext Agmt - Filed 4-1-08.pdf

Bernalillo County Groundwater Information Link

http://www.bernco.gov/live/departments.asp?dept=7242&submenuid=20943


      

 decisions by the Office of the State Engineer (OSE) and Public Regulation Commission (PRC) are proving to be critical now.  But now we are on to the next stage - making sure those decisions are enforced.  


 
What Happened.  On April 1, 2008, our water company,New Mexico Water Services Company, filed a contract with the Public Regulation Commission (PRC) saying they would extend the Sandia Knolls lines into Campbell Ranch and provide water for 750 homes.  (We appreciate the fact that NM Water Services Company told us they were doing this.)  We believes this nullifies the 2006 PRC ruling that there is no excess water in the Sandia Knolls system to sell.  So we have sent a letter to the PRC asking them to review the contract.  

 
In 2006, we all fought hard to get a decision from the State Engineer and the PRC saying that the Sandia Knolls system (owned by NM Water Resources) didn't have any excess water which could be sold.  That decision cost us $22,000 and we are profoundly grateful to all of you who helped us raise the money to get those legal decisions.  The decision puts us in a good position, but we have to defend it if we want it to stick.  This means (sigh) once again raising money to hire an attorney who can help us.  

 
New Mexico Water Services Corporation filed the contract between it and Campbell Ranch as a Line Extension.  There is apparently no formal review of these contract, unless there are complaints.  

 
What We Are Doing.  SKNA sent a letter April 28, 2008 to David King, our PRC Commissioner, asking for a review to see if that contract is consistent with their 2006 ruling.  We will also send copies to  Bernalillo County, the State Engineer, Edgewood and the newspapers.   We have talked to the PRC and the State Engineer about our concern that this contract essentially nullifies the previous rulings.   The first step is to let the PRC know we are concerned.   

 
Unfortunately, to enforce the PRC and OSE rulings will mean hiring a lawyer - and raising money to pay for a lawyer ---- again.  This decision is essentially a continuation of the decision that the Neighborhood Association made in 2006 to protect our water.  We were hoping that the decisions we got in 2006 would be the end of attempts to use Sandia Knolls water for Campbell, but it seems we were have to keep defending our water.  And this is a tricky area legally, so we need good legal help.  

 
Forming a Super-group of neighborhood Associations to Have Input into Development in this Area.  The water and development issues are very important to Sandia Knolls, but are also important to a lot of other people along North 14.  We are spearheading the formation of a larger "super-group" of neighborhood associations and landowners in this area.  It will be similar to the East Mountain Coalition, which deals with development issues in Bernalillo County, but  this new group will focus on issues that cross jurisdictional boundaries, and involve Sandoval, Bernalillo and Santa Fe Counties, as well as the Town of Edgewood and (if needed) Village of Tijeras.  For instance, Edgewood's Campbell Ranch, Santa Fe and Sandoval counties all are making policies which impact the traffic at Frost Road and North 14.  For this area to develop well, we need each of these jurisdictions to have a consistent vision for our community.  

 
This group, called the North 14 Forum, will focus on having an input in development issues by making sure our public processes work opening and well.  It will be incorporated, so it will be able to have standing in legal procedures, something that is hard for SKNA.  We also hope it will help with fund-raising (unfortunately, it costs a lot of money) and to strengthen the whole community's ability to influence how our community develops.  

 
What happened with the Appeal of Edgewood's Approval of Campbell's Preliminary Plat?   In December 2007, Edgewood approved Campbell's preliminary plat for development based on, among other things, a letter from NM Water Services Corporation saying they would supply water for 750 homes, using the water rights for the Sandia Knolls system.  SKNA appealed that approval formally, which required hiring Hess Yntema, a lawyer to develop that appeal. We appealed saying that Campbell had not really proved it had water available, and had not done adequate study of many other issues (such as traffic and sewage treatment) before getting this approval.  The appeal was heard in March, and the Edgewood Town Council upheld its decision.  This approval was probably a precursor to NM Water Service Company filing the Line Extension agreement (above) with the PRC.  

 
What we've done to try to keep people informed. We held a coffee  session down at Woobies to just talk about these things and a lot of people came.  We also have help open meeting in forming the North 14 Forum, and have been glad at the number of SKNA people who have participated.  So we're trying to keep people informed.  But we always miss someone ------- so if you want to find out something, just call one of the officers.  

 
What can you do?  If you are interested in participating in the North 14 Forum, call janet Winchester-Silbaugh (321-1581) for the location and time of the next meeting.  We have lots of things that people can do to help the community!!  Anyone who wants to help us raise money, please call one of the SKNA officers (contact info is on the Sandia Knolls website).  Let your elected representatives know what you think, and let the elected representatives of Edgewood, or other jurisdictions that impact us know what you think.  Call the PRC and ask the status of the review of the Campbell - NMWSC contract.  

 
If you have thoughts, comments or want to contribute......
We're trying hard to keep on top of this and to protect our water.  if you hear anything, call one of the SKNA officers.    We always welcome you thoughts and comments, because this is our neighborhood association.  So if you want to chat, give one of the officers a call.  

 

Water News 1/8/09
What's Happened in the Last Few Months

 
Short Summary

 
The Sandia Knolls Neighborhood Association Annual Meeting will be scheduled soon.  Come find out what's going on in the neighborhood!  

 
1. Edgewood Planning and Zoning tabled their decision about whether the extend Campbell Ranch's preliminary plat approval for the first 92 homes of its 4,023 home subdivision until its February meeting.  Sandia Knolls testified at that hearing and stated that we did not believe NM Water Services Company has enough water rights to serve the 400 current customers and the 750 homes it has contracted to serve in Campbell Ranch.  

 
2.  The Public Regulation Commission (PRC, which regulates utilities) held a pre-hearing meeting last Monday, where the Hearing Officer outlined the scope of the PRC case, how evidence from the 2006 case would be handled and laid out a calendar of events.  Sandia Knolls is a party to that case.  The PRC ordered that the case be re-advertised, so new protestants can join the case (see the East Mountain Telegraph for the legal notice), if they wish.  After all sides present evidence (again) the case is scheduled to be heard in late May or early June.  The PRC will decide if extending service into Campbell Ranch will impair NM Water Service Company's ability to furnish adequate, efficient and reasonable service.  

 
3.  The Office of the State Engineer (OSE, which regulates water) has just listed all the protestants in that case, and many people from Sandia Knolls are on the list of protestants.  The OSE will decide if there is enough wet water to serve the new homes, and will also decide if NM Water Service Company has enough water rights to do what it proposes.  NM Water Service has also applied to the OSE to add the new deep well drilled 2 years ago on Campbell Ranch and to add a large storage tank to serve Campbell Ranch.  

 

 
More Details

 
Sandia Knolls has been involved in making sure there is enough water to serve the Knolls for the last 7 years.  Our last efforts culminated in 2006, when the Public Regulation Commission (which regulates utilities) and the Office of the State Engineer (which regulates water) issued rulings that stated that all the water rights owned by the former utility had to be passed to NM Water Services Company, the current utility that runs the utility system which serves us because there were no excess water rights.  Sandia Knolls went through a lengthy legal case, at great expense, to get that ruling in 2006.

 
Since then, Campbell Ranch has contracted with NM Water Services Company, the utility that serves us, to provide water for 750 new homes to be built on Campbell Ranch using the water rights that are owned by the utility.  There are three separate legal actions that have come from this contract (Edgewood approval of their preliminay plat, the PRC application to extend water lines into Campbell Ranch and the OSE application for permission to use that much water).  

 
Campbell Ranch is a large proposed subdivision of 4.023 homes (about 10,000 people) that will be concentrated along North 14, starting at La Madera Road. Campbell Ranch annexed itself to Edgewood, which means that Edgewood has jurisdiction over the area, not Bernalillo County.  The first area to be built will have 6 homes per acres, a density comparable to Rio Rancho.   Such a large subdivision obviously has big implications for many things other than water: traffic on North 14, schools, water treatment, commercial development, fire protection, to name a few.  

 
One of the key arguments is how much water is needs for each house.  Experts disagree on that point ---- ranging from .25 (the number Campbell has used), to .33 (a common usage amount for the mountains to .6 acre feet (the standard Bernalillo County has set for new subdivisions.  Sandia Knolls has argued that current customers should be able to keep the County standard for use, since to reduce that level could put us at a disadvantage when compared to other homes nearby.  Our current use, however, is closer to .3 acre feet per home.  

 
Another important point is how much water there really is in the East Mountains.  The geology is very complex, and hydrologist are not able to answer that question with any certainty.  However, there are a number of water studies which point to stable water levels in some areas and declining water levels in other areas of the East Mountains.  

 
Sandia Knolls Neighorhood Association voted in 2005 at a full meeting to take legal action to maintain the water rights in the utility, so that current customers would have adequate water. That legal action cost $22,000 and required extensive fund-raising to pay for the legal and hydrological support needed.   In the summer of 2008, another public Sandia Knolls meeting reaffirmed that decision, and clarified that the Neighborhood Association opposes spreading the existing water rights over an added 750 homes (to less than 400 now served).

 
There is an active volunteer Water Committee that does this work on behalf of the Knolls, and major decisions are approved by the Sandia Knolls Neighborhood Association Board.  And for all of you who have volunteered (and there have been many --- doing everything from trying to get certain documents, to writing summaries for the mailbox information boxes to all the people who have helped with fund-raising) -------- we thank you for all of your help.  

 
2009 may be a big year.  We may have to hire a lawyer again, which means more fund-raising.  And if there is a lawyer in the Knolls who can give us advice, that would be very helpful.  If anyone wants to help us prepare for the February Edgewood Planning and Zoning meeting, call any of the officers of the Neighborhood Association, Kathy McCoy or janet Winchester-Silbaugh.  See the web site for phone numbers and contact information.

 
If you have comments or thoughts, please contact us.  The annual Sandia Knolls Neighborhood Association meeting will be scheduled sometime soon, so please come and find out what's going on!

 

 
Janet Winchester-Silbaugh
on behalf of the Water Committee

APPEAL OF P & Z APPROVAL OF
PRELIMINARY PLATS FOR

CAMPBELL RANCH, SU-2007-11 AND SU-2007-12

click Here (PDF file)

 

 

What IS SKNA Doing to Protect Our Water?

The Campbell Ranch-Edgewood Story

February 2008

click Here (PDF file)

 

Here is a large document containing the Hearing Examiners Decision.

PDF File (Large Download) Here

 

More information:  The PRC's decision regarding Surplus water rights here in the Knolls.

PDF file with the ruling, click Here

 

 



Phase One of Campbell Ranch OK'd

By Lee Ross
Mountain View Telegraph
    The first 92-home section of the Campbell Ranch development was approved by the Edgewood Planning and Zoning Commission on Monday night.
    Opposition is being expressed by neighboring residents, however, and possible legal hurdles have cropped up.
    After considerable discussion and a 10-minute closed session, a preliminary plat for the roughly 45-acre section on the southern part of Campbell Ranch was approved unanimously.
    Campbell Ranch is an 8,000-acre master-planned community east of N.M. 14 and north of Frost Road. The area was annexed by the town of Edgewood in 2001.
    About 30 people attended the meeting, including Edgewood Mayor Howard Calkins, Town Councilor Glenn Felton and state Rep. Kathy McCoy.
    Sheldon Greer of GND Engineering presented the plat.
    The proposed water supply for the development was one of the more contentious issues discussed, and it is still unresolved.
    Campbell Corp.'s current plan is to use water from a system in Sandia Knolls, which is served by New Mexico American Water Service Company, or NMAWSC.
    The system has enough excess water to serve up to 750 residential units in Campbell Ranch, according to a letter signed by Paul Risso, NMAWSC general manager.
    That claim was disputed by Janet Winchester-Silbaugh, a representative of the Sandia Knolls Neighborhood Association, who also said it is not certain the water company will pass the legal process necessary to provide that water.
    "We dispute NMAWSC's capability to serve the development until certain conditions are met," she said to the commission, reading from a letter.
    Before NMAWSC can supply water to Campbell Ranch, it must ask the PRC to overturn a 2006 ruling that declared there are no excess water rights for the system serving Sandia Knolls, she said.
    The Office of the State Engineer also must agree to designate Campbell Ranch as a place of use for the system, which may not be a simple matter, according to some Sandia Knolls residents.
    "It will be years before this is settled," McCoy, R-Cedar Crest, said in an interview during the planning commission's closed session. McCoy, who lives in Sandia Knolls, attended the meeting but did not comment publicly.
    She added that the original ruling by the PRC came at great expense to the neighborhood.
    "We expended thousands of dollars so that water rights would stay in our system," she said. "We thought this was done."
    Risso, who was on hand to answer questions after the meeting, had a different take. He said he thought it would take from six months to a year and a half to resolve the water issue. He did mention, however, that if the issue is challenged by Sandia Knolls residents it may take longer.
    His company recently took over the water system, Risso said, and has made a number of improvements over the last six months including fixing several leaks.
    In fact, the work was praised by several Sandia Knolls residents who came to Monday's meeting to protest the proposal to supply water supply to Campbell Ranch.
    Risso said he was pleased with the turnout, and even the protests. He said he would prefer for Sandia Knolls residents to have the opportunity to influence the outcome and be informed of the issues.
    "I'd much rather have everybody here from day one," he said.
    Another hurdle the development still faces is its Public Improvement District (PID).
    The PID is Campbell's proposed method of providing services such as fire protection, emergency medical and animal control services, and infrastructure such as water and electricity to the area. It also protects Edgewood from a legal obligation to provide those services.
    David Henderson, who was Edgewood's attorney from 2002 until earlier this year and has worked on the PID for a number of years, attended the meeting as an adviser to the commission.
    Henderson said he'd seen a draft of the PID agreement between Campbell Corp. and Bernalillo County, but it is not yet finalized. He explained that the lots cannot be sold until the agreement is finalized.
    "I think (approving the plat) would turn the heat up on the PID pot," he said.
    Along with the PID and water, Greer discussed several other issues the proposed development has addressed or is working on.
    Grading and drainage, traffic studies, required traffic mitigation and sewer treatment were discussed, but none of these issues created much of a stir.
    Initially the subdivision will use a lagoon system for wastewater treatment, which generally involves a combination of septic tanks and a holding pond, or lagoon, rather than a drain field.
    The system is the first part of a staged investment ending in a sewer treatment plant, Greer said.
    After the planning commission's closed session, all members affirmed under oath that they had not discussed how they would vote regarding the proposed development.
    In his motion to approve the plat, Commissioner Rey Fulwiler stipulated that approval was contingent upon the town's development agreement (which includes language about the PID) as well as all state statutes and local ordinances, and that water issues be cleared through the PRC and State Engineer.
    The decision to approve was unanimous.
    After the meeting Campbell Corp. president Robert Gately, who also attended, said he felt the review process went well.
    He also said the planned community will be something of a legacy for the Campbell family.
    "I think generally people are now starting to believe that we have a strong commitment to quality," he said.

Sandia Knolls Neighborhood Association

Our Summary of Campbell Ranch’s Plans

Based on a Public meeting December 11, 2007

 I thought you all might to know what is planned for Campbell Ranch, so I wrote this summary of a public meeting that was held last night.  The meeting was held at East Mountain High School, December 11, 2007.  There were perhaps 50 people attending the meeting, of whom 5 or so were from the Knolls.  (Thanks to those of you who attended.)  This information is from my hand-written notes (and sometimes the lights were out, making writing interesting), and I apologize in advance if my notes are not perfect. 

                        Janet Winchester-Silbaugh

 The meeting was largely run by Jim Lindeman, the Development Director of Campbell Corporation.  Robert Gately, President and a representative of Smith Engineering were also at the meeting.

The town of Edgewood has approved the Campbell Ranch Master Plan, which represents the first phase of what will be the largest master-planned community in New Mexico, eventually encompassing an area in excess of 28,000 acres.

The Campbell Ranch Master Plan envisions a mountain community of 4,023 homes, two golf courses, a resort, and commercial areas on 8,046 acres. Roughly 50% of this land will be held as open space, including nearly 3,000 acres of Monte Largo, a mountain range that the Campbell Farming Corporation, and an additional 900 acres of South Mountain.

 Campbell plans 4 villages:

    • village 1, west of East Mountain High School,

    • village 2 east of Highway 14, between La Madera Road and the first Paako entrance,

    • village 3, about where the trailer is east of Highway 14, and

    • village 4, north along Highway 14. 

 Campbell wants to begin work on village 2 in 2008, including 92 home sites and the commercial area, out of the total of 1400 home sites “entitled” for village 2.  Many homes may cost in the $300,000-$400,000 range and will be bound by design guidelines. 

Each village will have a high concentration of housing in the center, radiating out to areas of lower density at the edges.  Each village will also incorporate open space at the edges.   Campbell has tried hard to maintain the look of open space along Highway 14 with set-backs and open space along roads.    

 Each village will have a “village green”, a commercial area.  The largest commercial area, about 30 acres, will be part of village 2.  The commercial areas will include things like a grocery store, and other commercial services needed by a community of this size.

 The maps showed 2 golf courses, a 9-hole course near village 2 and a second course near village 3.  It shows Monte Largo and South Mountain as open space, as well as the riparian area along San Pedro Creek. 

 The audience asked numerous questions, and the answers below are what I heard from the answers. 

 Where will water come from?  Campbell is working on a combination of off-site and on-site water.  They believe they already have adequate water on-site for the first phase of development (not clear if this was the first 92 home or village 2).  They have a letter from New Mexico Water Resources concerning using some of the current Sandia Knolls water to support part of the frist phase of development.  It was not clear how many acre feet they were talking about.  They said that New Mexico Water Resources would be having a meeting soon to explain what the agreement entails.  No representative of New Mexico Water Resources was present at the meeting. 

Campbell said they have two wells: an old agricultural well, which was used starting in 1941 for winter wheat, carrots and cattle.  They did not answer the question of how much water was used or the size of the acreage farmed or number of cattle.  The second well is a test well drilled in the summer of 2007 near the south end of the property.  They said this well had a 1000-foot column of water and pumped 1000 acres a minute (if I understood correctly).  They are just now evaluating the effect of pumping on nearby wells. 

 Campbell did not say how much water they would be using in the long run, but that the rule of thumb for residential use is ¼ acre-feet per housing unit. 

 Will lots be sold to builders or individuals?  Campbell is working with a number of (unnamed) builders who will build sections of homes.  Quality standards are included in the master plan.  There are design guidelines (although it is not clear what is in these guidelines).

 Will all roads come onto Highway 14, or will some tie in to the east?  All roads will go into Highway 14, although there may also be development on the east side of Monte Largo (undefined at this point).

 Where will services come from?   Campbell is negotiating with Bernalillo County for services such as fire, EMT, police and animal control. 

 Utilities and Turquoise Trail.  Many of the power lines may be underground.  The utility lines that already serve San Pedro Creek overlook are already big enough to serve Campbell Ranch, because they were anticipated when those lines were laid.  Campbell will soon begin talking to PNM about electrical power. 

 What farming was done using the agricultural well?  Acres, location, years of operation, etc.  Campbell said they farmed winter wheat, carrots, cattle, starting in 1941 but said they would look into the location, number of acres, and years farmed. 

 How big is the village 2 commercial area?  31 acres, along Highway 14.  Village 2 has by far the largest commercial area.  Campbell said they would control the commercial area and there would not be 40-feet tall MacDonalds signs, a Costco or K-Mart.  The Master Plan indicates drive-thru’s, but Campbell said they do not anticipate this type of commercial business.  Village 1 has 10 acres of commercial space.  Village 4 has almost none. 

 Why did Campbell seek annexation to Edgewood?  Campbell said it annexed to Edgewood because Bernalillo County did not have a process to approve a master plan, but only had subdivision process.   This seemed to mean that Bernalillo county expected Campbell to define many things in greater detail at the beginning of the process, rather than letting the process evolve.  Edgewood had a master plan process, though it was fairly new.    

 Will there be height restrictions?  Yes, the master plan has height restrictions.

 Will there be buffers between Campbell and other properties?  Yes, there will be a visual buffer open space along Highway 14, which may be 150 to 300 feet wide.  Robert Gately stated that he would use 500 feet buffers if needed.  There will be a buffer between Campbell and Sandia Knolls.  Housing density along the southern border will be 1.4 housing units per acre. 

 San Pedro Creek and the wild horse herd.  Campbell will maintain historic flow patterns in San Pedro Creek.  They are working on the issue of how to handle the wild herd of horses. 

 

http://www.ose.state.nm.us/more_info_index.html New Mexico State Engineers website with links to water information.

http://www.campbellcorporation.com/index.htm Homepage of Campbell Corporation.

Our next great concern regarding water issues for The Sandia Knolls is the development of the Campbell Ranch on our Northern boundary and the effect of the Campbell Ranches water wells on our existing aquifer. This is an issue that we will be following for a long time to come.

Sandia Knolls Resident,

I want to take this letter to let everyone know that we have been very successful in our fund raising campaigns. We have raised enough to have the fire hydrant to be installed at the entrance to the Knolls, so now the fire department will have a source of water closer than driving all the way to the post office to refill their trucks. This will mean that in the event of a structural fire in the Knolls or surrounding developments the overall response and follow-up time will be more likely to save a residence. Please remember that in case of a wildfire, having these resources are not necessarily going to save the area. The best plan of action for all of us in wildfire situations is planning for the worst, and practicing your plan so it will not give you any surprises.

This kind of practice is just like fire drill practice in grade school.

The more you do it the less alarmed you will be in case of a real emergency.

We still have a long way to go before the lawyer we all hired to protect our water rights receives her final payment. In that vein, Janet, Pat, and Viola are planning another community rummage sale at the church on Frost Road. They are looking for any donations, goods to sell, etc., that you can give that will help our efforts in raising funds.

Janet can be reached at silbaugh@swcp.com , Viola at bunchs@earthlink.net , and Pat at 286-8705. Please contact with anything that you can provide that could help. This money is going to the lawyer to pay her for the successful defense of out community water rights, which I believe everyone should contribute to.

An update on the letter sent out for fund raising. We sent about 425 letters out, of which about 30 have been returned due to bad addresses.

Out of this total, we have received just over 80 responses. The cost of the mailing was covered by my brother's business. This cost was just over $165.00. The 80 or so replies allowed us to go forward with the hydrant, and have some left over for the lawyer. But we have a long way to go. If everyone in the community sent in the requested $50, we could raise over $20,000. This would obviously pay all of our expenses, and we would have a small sum left over that could be used towards building a bulletin board sign at the entrance, another of our projects. I thank all of those who have sent their contributions in to Sue Clark-Sorger.

But I am disappointed that more residents do not see the value in the saving of the water rights, and feel that each of us should make an effort to get our non participating neighbors to help. The neighborhood association has no interest in becoming a organization that tells each of you how you have to live and play on your property. But I believe the causes that we have supported are worthy of your support, as well as your neighbors. Please help us in our efforts.

Charles Ramirez from Bernalillo County Zoning Enforcement has informed me that BC will be having a FREE clean-up day in October for the residents of the Knolls. Just like the clean-up days last year, you will be able to haul all your unwanted wood, junk, paints, gas, and anything else to the county yard next to the fire station on Frost Road. The date has not been finalized, and I will keep you posted when Charles lets me know. This will be an ideal opportunity to clear out some of the stuff that accumulates around the house. I know that I have a bunch of stuff that I need to haul. Slowly but surely we are making our community a little less of a fire hazard. Keep up the good work. Remember, community rummage sale: Saturday, September 23, 9 am - 3 pm. All leftover goods will be donated to the Talking Talons Thrift Store. Contact Janet, Viola, or Pat with donations, volunteer help, or anything else that you can contribute. Thanks, John Helmich

 

 

 

 

SKNA News; From John Helmich

   Kathy McCoy (Vice President of SKNA) and I are exploring the installation of a fire hydrant at the entrance to the Knolls. John Jones, the Entranosa Water Company head administrator, has already informed me that Entranosa Water is willing to let us place the hydrant on their water line that parallels Frost Road. The reason we need to use their water line is because no water line within the Knolls is large enough to supply a fire truck at the water flow rate the fire department needs during an emergency. So the first hurdle has been cleared. Kathy is in touch with Bernalillo County to find out if there is any money available to pay for the installation of the hydrant. It will take about $3000 for this and since we can't even pay the lawyer, we obviously have no money for this also.

 

Breaking News!! From John Helmich

 Great news! Our lawyer has informed me that we have won! The PRC hearing examiner has ruled that ALL the paper water rights need to be retained within the utility, meaning that no water rights can be sold as surplus. The examiner has ruled that as far as she is concerned all the water rights that IUC possesses must be kept by the utility for the future development of Sandia Knolls and the other small development that IUC supplies. Of course, this is not the full PRC ruling, but from what I have been told, the examiner's recommendations are rarely overturned or reversed. Be aware that the appeals process is still in play, so this is just the first but most important step in our drive to make sure our community water availability does not disappear. So our decision to retain the lawyer has produced positive results. In fact, better than I or she had expected. All the more reason that we need to show our thanks to her by getting her paid.

    On that note, I am trying to organize a rummage sale for sometime in May (hopefully) at the community church frontage area along Frost Road. I need everyone to make some sort of commitment, either in goods that they would like to donate, or in their time, to make this event happen. Please let me know ASAP what you can do. We need to maximize the number of goods, and minimize volunteers helping sell the goods, since too many people helping does not pay the lawyer's fee for her services rendered.
 

 

 

 

From Earlier SKNA E-Mail

What we need to do now regarding the on-going water issues before the PRC. Although I have not kept everyone up to date on this, things are moving forward. In October during the meeting about the water situation, the community overwhelmingly decided that we would hire a lawyer to protect our interests in the PRC hearing about the sale of IUC. During the past few months the PRC held meetings at which testimony was made regarding water rates, excess water rights, and setting acre feet of water per household. The lawyer that we retained hired an expert on the water surplus issue, and she testified on our behalf. I attended this hearing along with Chris Bettman, one of your neighbors. The testimony centered on what level the PRC should set for IUC to retain water rights for households that they service, primarily Sandia Knolls residents. To clarify, IUC was given approximately 325 acre feet of water rights that they could pump and sell to their customers. Presently, they are pumping about 0.25 acre feet per household to their customers. If you assume that all their customers are within the development, this means that presently they are actually using about 87.5 acre feet of water rights (assuming 350 homes as customers.) The issue before the PRC is whether or not IUC can sell the balance of their water rights, and also set what they are required to deliver to Sandia Knolls residents at 0.25 acre feet per year. Our lawyer and our expert she hired testified that we feel that this limit is much too low, and should be set at 0.6 acre feet per year per household. If we use the same 350 homes estimate, this means that our lawyer is asking the PRC to make IUC retain a minimum of 210 acre feet of water rights for sale to Sandia Knolls. In conjunction with that, another important fact needed to be considered. There are potentially over 500 lots in Sandia Knolls that can be built on, so the actual acre feet of water that would need to be retained by the utility is closer to 300 acre feet of water rights to support the future of the Knolls. Our lawyer is trying to prevent the setting of required water rights at the unrealistic level of 0.25 acre feet. I believe that the PRC will probably set the number somewhere between 0.25 and what we asked for,0.6 acre feet. But the reality is that there is no guarantee of this. We have made it possible that this could happen by having our lawyer bring our interests before the PRC. It is my belief that is we had not done this, the PRC would have ruled on this issue for the water utility, and set our water rights at the 0.25 level. But because you in the community showed an interest in what is happening, we may have some influence in the final outcome. The PRC will be deliberating within the next few weeks on this, so we should be getting word of a decision soon.

 

 

 

Website created and Maintained by Mark Emery Consulting