|









| |
==========================
Update on the Water Issues in
Sandia Knolls
There are three different regulatory
agencies in the water issues:
Public Regulation Commission (PRC) regulates utilities ---
pipes, pumps, service
Office of the State Engineer (OSE) regulates water ---- wells,
water rights and how water can be used
Town of Edgewood regulates the subdivision itself ----- lots
sizes, design of the subdivision, roads, wastewater systems,
etc.
because Campbell has been annexed to Edgewood
PRC - will hear the NM Water Services
application to serve Campbell Ranch in January, even though
Campbell Ranch's contract with NM Water services has been
cancelled. SKNA is part of that hearing, and particularly
concerned that there are enough water rights maintained to
serve all customers (built and vacant lots) in the service
area.
OSE - Aquifer Sciences, a water
developer, has contracted to drill an exploratory well on
Campbell land and applied for 1500 acre feet of water rights.
There are about 230 protestants to their application, which
will be adjudicated using OSE's usual process. There is no
PRC application yet, for the utility system to use Aquifer
Sciences water in Campbell Ranch.
Edgewood - The Planning and Zoning
Commission will hear Campbell's application for approval to
extent its Preliminary Plat for another 2 years on October
5th. The application will include Aquifer Sciences as the
water provider.
For those of you who want more
details:
Recent news of New Mexico Water
Service's application to PRC to use water rights to serve
Campbell Ranch
In 2008, NM Water Service Corporation
notified the Public Regulation Commission (PRC), which
regulates utilities, that it would extend service into
Campbell Ranch using water rights that now used to serve
Sandia Knolls and surrounding areas. Sandia Knolls
Neighborhood Association (SKNA) protested that application and
there have been numerous briefs filed. SKNA's primary concern
was that NM Water Services Company did not have enough water
rights to serve all existing customers, potential new
customers with undeveloped lots in NM Water Services's service
area, and also extend services to an additional 750 homes in
Campbell Ranch (about tripling the number of homes served with
the same water rights). NM Water Services
maintained that it would benefit Sandia Knolls to have more
customers sharing the costs of upgrading the system.
In August 2009, Campbell Ranch
cancelled its contract with NM Water Services Company. NM
Water Services notified the PRC that it was withdrawing its
application to extend service into Campbell Ranch, because it
no longer had a contract with Campbell Ranch. But the PRC did
not agree to let NM Water Services withdraw. The Commission
said this is the second time this issue has come up, and that
the briefs already filed had raised significant public
interest issues which deserved to be addressed. In
particular, NM Water Services had maintained in its brief that
it only had to serve customers on a first come first serve
basis. This means that NM Water Services would be obligated
to serve customers in the order they signed up and if NM Water
Services used up the water rights it owned, it could possibly
deny service to later customers in its service area. This
could potentially mean than vacant lots in Sandia Knolls,
which now can expect to be served, might not be able to get
service from NM Water Services. We expect that the PRC will
address this and other issues at the scheduled January 2010
hearing.
Recent news of the OSE applications
In 2008, NM Water Services also
applied to the OSE to expand its area of use for its water
into Campbell Ranch. While the PRC (above) regulates
utilities, NM Water Services needed OSE approval to use the
water for Campbell Ranch. SKNA and many individuals protested
the OSE application. And when Campbell cancelled their
contract with NM Water Services, NM Water Services in turn
withdrew its application to the OSE. The OSE (unlike the PRC)
let them withdraw their application.
Campbell Ranch still needs water, so
it has an agreement with Aquifer Sciences, a California/Nevada
water development company, to develop water on Campbell Ranch.
There is some talk that Campbell Ranch would have first
rights to the water they find, and then other water could be
sold to other parties. In August 2009, Aquifer Sciences filed
an application with the OSE to drill first an exploratory
well, and to use 1500 acre feet of water rights. This is the
big well drilling rig that you can see about a mile north of
Frost, east on North 14. It is drilling an exploratory well.
Presumably, Aquifer Sciences will use the data it gets from
this well in its OSE application.
There are roughly 230 protestants to
this OSE application, including people who live in Sandia
Knolls.
No one knows how much water is really
in the aquifer, or how the underground rocks and faults all
fit together. So this will be one piece of important
information to answer the question of how much water is down
there, although it may not address how the water flows. The
other question is whether new water rights should be granted,
since many other people already have water rights in the
Sandia Basin. The OSE will have to determine if there are
enough water rights "left" to support this new withdrawal of
water. Since Bernalillo County has documented that water
levels in this part of the Basin have been dropping, this
decision may impact many people in the community. Based on
very rough calculations of the population in the area and
water use, 1500 acre feet of water may be about a doubling of
the current withdrawals from the aquifer.
SKNA wants to make sure that there is
enough wet water in the aquifer to serve the current community
(of which Sandia Knolls is just a small part) before water
rights are approved for a commercial water developer.
Recent new of Campbell Ranch's
application to the Town of Edgewood's for Approval of its
Preliminary Plat
A preliminary plat lays out the
outline of a subdivision - roads, main areas of development,
etc. The Town of Edgewood annexed Campbell Ranch in 2001, so
it has jurisdiction in this case. Edgewood approved
Campbell Ranch's Preliminary Plat in December 2007, based
water from NM Water Services. SKNA appealed this approval,
but lost. Since Preliminary Plats are only good for 12
months, Campbell Ranch applied to Edgewood for a 2-year
extension. Edgewood's Planning and Zoning Commission did not
approve this extension, so Campbell Ranch appealed to the full
Town Council. Then, when Campbell Ranch changed water sources
(cancelled the contract with NM Water Services and partnered
with Aquifer Sciences) the Town Council decided to send the
issue back to the Planning and Zoning Commission for a new
decision.
Which brings us to the October 5th
meeting of the Edgewood Planning and Zoning Commission. The
Commission will rehear Campbell Ranch's application for a
2-year extension of their Preliminary Plat. If the extension
is approved, Campbell can continue with its development plans,
and will have to still get approval from the PRC for the
utility aspects of its water system and from the OSE for
water. If the Edgewood Planning and Zoning Commission does
not approve the extension, Campbell can re-apply for approval
of its Preliminary Plat when it is ready.
|
|
From the Mountain View Telegraph
| Written
by Lee Ross |
| Thursday,
23 July 2009 09:54 |
| New Mexico Water Service Co.
has terminated a request to extend its water line into Campbell
Ranch, according to Public Regulation Commission document.
The water line extension was proposed from
Sandia Knolls subdivision and was part of the evidence for the
original approval of Campbell Ranch's preliminary plat, which was
granted by the town of Edgewood after going through several appeals.
Campbell Ranch, an 8,000-acre
master-planned community east of N.M. 14 and north of Frost Road.
The whole area was annexed by the town of Edgewood in 2001, and a
preliminary plat for the first 92-home section of the development
was approved by the Edgewood Town Council in March 2008 and was set
to expire in March of this year.
Foreseeing delays in moving forward on the
development, David Campbell, an attorney representing Campbell
Corp., appeared before the Edgewood Planning and Zoning Commission
several times requesting an extension of the preliminary plat and
had the request tabled each time, until March 16, when the
commission voted not to extend the time frame for the plat.
That decision was appealed and is scheduled
to come before the Edgewood Town Council for a public hearing on Aug
5.
The termination of Campbell Corp.'s
agreement with New Mexico Water Service Co. could condense that
hearing, which would normally be quite involved, into a relatively
simple matter.
Throughout the appeals and requests for
plat approval, it was the agreement between Campbell and the water
company that was used as evidence that the development was ready for
preliminary plat approval.
According to town regulations, developments
should have a source of water before being granted plat approval.
It may not be so simple, however.
Campbell's efforts to obtain water for the
development seem to be continuing, but in a different direction.
There is currently an application by
another company, Aquifer Science LLC out of Nevada, before the
Office of the State Engineer to drill wells on Campbell Farming
Corp. property and divert up to 1,500 acre-feet of water.
Some property owners from the nearby area,
including residents of Sandia Knolls, have submitted protest
letters, according to a series of e-mails sent out about the issue.
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
7-14-08 Letter from Paul Risso NMWSCo.
Good afternoon everyone. As you know from my previous emails, New
Mexico Water Service Company has made filings with both the Public
Regulation Commission (NMPRC) and the State Engineer's Office relative
to it's Sandia Knolls water system.
Now that the process is underway at the NMPRC and a
case has been docketed (No. 08-00177-UT), if you wish to stay abreast
of the proceedings you may do so by registering on the NMPRC website.
Below is a link that will take you to the NMPRC
website. Once there click on the box titled "PRC Case Dockets" and
follow the instructions from there. I have attached the latest
documents related to that filing.
I will continue to keep you apprised as to our
filing with the State Engineer's Office.
Have a nice weekend.
Paul Risso
New Mexico Water Service Company
PRC. Order Rescheduling Pre-Hearing Conference (7-30-08) (W0848669).PDF
PRC. Motion to Reschedule Pre-Hearing Conference (Endorsed) (W0848659).PDF
|
|
Recent Changes in the Regulatory Cases Involving our Water
company
May, 2009 update
There are three regulatory cases which impact NM water Services
Company and teh water it provides to Sandia Knolls and other
customers. What follows is a summary of the recent events.
Campbell's application to Edgewood Planning and Zoning for
Preliminary Plat Approval. Campbell Ranch applied to Edgewood
in December 2007 for preliminary plat approval to develop Campbell
Ranch. Campbell has a contract with NM Water Services company
(which serves Sandia Knolls) to provide water to Campbell Ranch
with the water rights now used to serve current customers.
Edgewood approved the preliminary plat until March 2009. In
March, Campbell applied to Edgewood for an extension of that
preliminary plat, and the Edgewood Planning and Zoning Commission
did not approve the extension. Campbell has appealed the ruling
to the Edgewood Town Council. The appeal will be heard by the
Town Council on June 3 at 6:00 at the Edgewood community Center
(just east of the Dairy Queen on the north interstate frontage
road). The public is welcome and Sandia Knolls will have
representatives attending this meeting.
NM Water Service Company's application to the Public Regulation
Commission. NMWSC applied to the PRC for approval to extend
the current Sandia Knolls water system infrastructure into
Campbell Ranch. The PRC regulates utility rates
and infrastructure. Sandia Knolls is an intervener in this case,
because we are concerned with the impact this large extension will
have on the old water pipes and other infrastructure that serves
the Knolls. We are also concerned about the impact of such a
large expansion on our rates, and the draw-down on the aquifer
with increased pumping. We are concerned that NMWSC's "first come
first serve" practice would mean that NMWSC might not have enough
water rights to serve landowners with vacant land in NMWSC's
service area in the future. NMWSC argues that this extension
would provide the current users with another well and a large
water storage tank. This case has been going on for about a year,
with NMWSC, the State, and interveners participating by submitting
briefs and motions. The hearing, after which the Hearing Officer
will make a recommendation to the PRC Commission, was recently
re-scheduled for late August.
NM Water Service Company's application to the Office of the
State Engineer. NMWSC has also applied to the OSE for
permission to use its current water rights to supply Campbell
Ranch in addition to the current service area. The OSE regulates
the use of water in the State. A long-scheduled hearing was
scheduled for May 2009, but NMWSC moved to vacate the hearing at
the last minute. The OSE has requested a status update in August,
2009. Sandia Knolls residents are also participating in this
case. We are concerned that increased water used by Campbell will
deplete the aquifer faster than the already declining levels with
current use. We are also concerned that adding a new well with
unknown water quality may reduce our water quality and cause havoc
with the aging pipes which run through the Knolls.
The Sandia Knolls Neighborhood Association water group appreciates
your support at the last SKNA meeting. This is an expensive
process, since SKNA must get legal help to be effective. A
donation to SKNA to support this work would be greatly
appreciated. Donations can be sent to SKNA Treasurer, Sue
Neustel, 6 Longview, Sandia Park. If you have questions or
comments, the water group wants to hear them. Please call Janet
Winchester-Silbaugh (321-1581).
Petition for Declaratory Order pdf file.
What Happened. On April 1, 2008, our water company,New Mexico
Water Services Company, filed a contract with the Public Regulation
Commission (PRC) saying they would extend the Sandia Knolls lines into
Campbell Ranch and provide water for 750 homes. (We appreciate the fact
that NM Water Services Company told us they were doing this.) We believes
this nullifies the 2006 PRC ruling that there is no excess water in the
Sandia Knolls system to sell. So we have sent a letter to the PRC asking
them to review the contract.
In 2006, we all fought hard to get a decision from the State Engineer and
the PRC saying that the Sandia Knolls system (owned by NM Water Resources)
didn't have any excess water which could be sold. That decision cost us
$22,000 and we are profoundly grateful to all of you who helped us raise
the money to get those legal decisions. The decision puts us in a good
position, but we have to defend it if we want it to stick. This means
(sigh) once again raising money to hire an attorney who can help us.
New Mexico Water Services Corporation filed the contract between it and
Campbell Ranch as a Line Extension. There is apparently no formal review
of these contract, unless there are complaints.
What We Are Doing. SKNA sent a letter April 28, 2008 to David
King, our PRC Commissioner, asking for a review to see if that contract is
consistent with their 2006 ruling. We will also send copies to
Bernalillo County, the State Engineer, Edgewood and the newspapers. We
have talked to the PRC and the State Engineer about our concern that this
contract essentially nullifies the previous rulings. The first step is
to let the PRC know we are concerned.
Unfortunately, to enforce the PRC and OSE rulings will mean hiring a
lawyer - and raising money to pay for a lawyer ---- again. This decision
is essentially a continuation of the decision that the
Neighborhood Association made in 2006 to protect our water. We were
hoping that the decisions we got in 2006 would be the end of attempts to
use Sandia Knolls water for Campbell, but it seems we were have to keep
defending our water. And this is a tricky area legally, so we need good
legal help.
Forming a Super-group of neighborhood Associations to Have Input into
Development in this Area. The water and development issues are very
important to Sandia Knolls, but are also important to a lot of other
people along North 14. We are spearheading the formation of a larger
"super-group" of neighborhood associations and landowners in this area.
It will be similar to the East Mountain Coalition, which deals with
development issues in Bernalillo County, but this new group will focus on
issues that cross jurisdictional boundaries, and involve Sandoval,
Bernalillo and Santa Fe Counties, as well as the Town of Edgewood and (if
needed) Village of Tijeras. For instance, Edgewood's Campbell Ranch,
Santa Fe and Sandoval counties all are making policies which impact the
traffic at Frost Road and North 14. For this area to develop well, we
need each of these jurisdictions to have a consistent vision for our
community.
This group, called the North 14 Forum, will focus on having an input in
development issues by making sure our public processes work opening and
well. It will be incorporated, so it will be able to have standing in
legal procedures, something that is hard for SKNA. We also hope it will
help with fund-raising (unfortunately, it costs a lot of money) and to
strengthen the whole community's ability to influence how our community
develops.
What happened with the Appeal of Edgewood's Approval of
Campbell's Preliminary Plat? In December 2007, Edgewood approved
Campbell's preliminary plat for development based on, among other things,
a letter from NM Water Services Corporation saying they would supply water
for 750 homes, using the water rights for the Sandia Knolls system. SKNA
appealed that approval formally, which required hiring Hess Yntema, a
lawyer to develop that appeal. We appealed saying that Campbell had not
really proved it had water available, and had not done adequate study of
many other issues (such as traffic and sewage treatment) before getting
this approval. The appeal was heard in March, and the Edgewood Town
Council upheld its decision. This approval was probably a precursor to NM
Water Service Company filing the Line Extension agreement (above) with the
PRC.
What we've done to try to keep people informed. We held a coffee
session down at Woobies to just talk about these things and a lot of
people came. We also have help open meeting in forming the North 14
Forum, and have been glad at the number of SKNA people who have
participated. So we're trying to keep people informed. But we always
miss someone ------- so if you want to find out something, just call one
of the officers.
What can you do? If you are interested in participating in the
North 14 Forum, call janet Winchester-Silbaugh (321-1581) for the location
and time of the next meeting. We have lots of things that people can do
to help the community!! Anyone who wants to help us raise money, please
call one of the SKNA officers (contact info is on the Sandia Knolls
website). Let your elected representatives know what you think, and let
the elected representatives of Edgewood, or other jurisdictions that
impact us know what you think. Call the PRC and ask the status of the
review of the Campbell - NMWSC contract.
If you have thoughts, comments or want to contribute......
We're trying hard to keep on top of this and to protect our water. if you
hear anything, call one of the SKNA officers. We always welcome you
thoughts and comments, because this is our neighborhood association. So
if you want to chat, give one of the officers a call.
|
Water News 1/8/09
What's Happened in the Last Few Months
Short Summary
The Sandia Knolls Neighborhood Association Annual Meeting will
be scheduled soon. Come find out what's going on in
the neighborhood!
1. Edgewood Planning and Zoning tabled their decision about
whether the extend Campbell Ranch's preliminary plat approval for
the first 92 homes of its 4,023 home subdivision until its
February meeting. Sandia Knolls testified at that hearing and
stated that we did not believe NM Water Services Company has
enough water rights to serve the 400 current customers and the 750
homes it has contracted to serve in Campbell Ranch.
2. The Public Regulation Commission (PRC, which regulates
utilities) held a pre-hearing meeting last Monday, where the
Hearing Officer outlined the scope of the PRC case, how evidence
from the 2006 case would be handled and laid out a calendar of
events. Sandia Knolls is a party to that case. The PRC ordered
that the case be re-advertised, so new protestants can join the
case (see the East Mountain Telegraph for the legal notice), if
they wish. After all sides present evidence (again) the case is
scheduled to be heard in late May or early June. The PRC will
decide if extending service into Campbell Ranch will impair NM
Water Service Company's ability to furnish adequate, efficient and
reasonable service.
3. The Office of the State Engineer (OSE, which regulates water)
has just listed all the protestants in that case, and many people
from Sandia Knolls are on the list of protestants. The OSE will
decide if there is enough wet water to serve the new homes, and
will also decide if NM Water Service Company has enough water
rights to do what it proposes. NM Water Service has also applied
to the OSE to add the new deep well drilled 2 years ago on
Campbell Ranch and to add a large storage tank to serve Campbell
Ranch.
More Details
Sandia Knolls has been involved in making sure there is enough
water to serve the Knolls for the last 7 years. Our last efforts
culminated in 2006, when the Public Regulation Commission (which
regulates utilities) and the Office of the State Engineer (which
regulates water) issued rulings that stated that all the water
rights owned by the former utility had to be passed to NM Water
Services Company, the current utility that runs the utility system
which serves us because there were no excess water rights. Sandia
Knolls went through a lengthy legal case, at great expense, to get
that ruling in 2006.
Since then, Campbell Ranch has contracted with NM Water Services
Company, the utility that serves us, to provide water for 750 new
homes to be built on Campbell Ranch using the water rights that
are owned by the utility. There are three separate legal actions
that have come from this contract (Edgewood approval of their
preliminay plat, the PRC application to extend water lines into
Campbell Ranch and the OSE application for permission to use that
much water).
Campbell Ranch is a large proposed subdivision of 4.023 homes
(about 10,000 people) that will be concentrated along North 14,
starting at La Madera Road. Campbell Ranch annexed itself to
Edgewood, which means that Edgewood has jurisdiction over the
area, not Bernalillo County. The first area to be built will have
6 homes per acres, a density comparable to Rio Rancho. Such a
large subdivision obviously has big implications for many things
other than water: traffic on North 14, schools, water treatment,
commercial development, fire protection, to name a few.
One of the key arguments is how much water is needs for each
house. Experts disagree on that point ---- ranging from .25 (the
number Campbell has used), to .33 (a common usage amount for the
mountains to .6 acre feet (the standard Bernalillo County has set
for new subdivisions. Sandia Knolls has argued that current
customers should be able to keep the County standard for use,
since to reduce that level could put us at a disadvantage when
compared to other homes nearby. Our current use, however, is
closer to .3 acre feet per home.
Another important point is how much water there really is in the
East Mountains. The geology is very complex, and hydrologist are
not able to answer that question with any certainty. However,
there are a number of water studies which point to stable water
levels in some areas and declining water levels in other areas of
the East Mountains.
Sandia Knolls Neighorhood Association voted in 2005 at a full
meeting to take legal action to maintain the water rights in the
utility, so that current customers would have adequate water. That
legal action cost $22,000 and required extensive fund-raising to
pay for the legal and hydrological support needed. In the summer
of 2008, another public Sandia Knolls meeting reaffirmed that
decision, and clarified that the Neighborhood Association opposes
spreading the existing water rights over an added 750 homes (to
less than 400 now served).
There is an active volunteer Water Committee that does this work
on behalf of the Knolls, and major decisions are approved by the
Sandia Knolls Neighborhood Association Board. And for all of you
who have volunteered (and there have been many --- doing
everything from trying to get certain documents, to writing
summaries for the mailbox information boxes to all the people who
have helped with fund-raising) -------- we thank you for all of
your help.
2009 may be a big year. We may have to hire a lawyer again, which
means more fund-raising. And if there is a lawyer in the Knolls
who can give us advice, that would be very helpful. If anyone
wants to help us prepare for the February Edgewood Planning and
Zoning meeting, call any of the officers of the Neighborhood
Association, Kathy McCoy or janet Winchester-Silbaugh. See the
web site for phone numbers and contact information.
If you have comments or thoughts, please contact us. The
annual Sandia Knolls Neighborhood Association meeting will be
scheduled sometime soon, so please come and find out what's going
on!
Janet Winchester-Silbaugh
on behalf of the Water Committee
APPEAL OF P & Z APPROVAL OF
PRELIMINARY PLATS FOR
CAMPBELL RANCH, SU-2007-11 AND SU-2007-12
click
Here (PDF file)
What IS SKNA Doing
to Protect Our Water?
The Campbell
Ranch-Edgewood Story
February 2008
click
Here
(PDF file)
|
|
Here is a large document containing the
Hearing Examiners Decision.
PDF File (Large Download)
Here
More information: The PRC's
decision regarding Surplus water rights here in the Knolls.
PDF file with the ruling, click Here
Thursday,
December 20, 2007
Phase One of Campbell Ranch OK'd
Mountain View Telegraph
The first 92-home section of the Campbell Ranch development was
approved by the Edgewood Planning and Zoning Commission on Monday night.
Opposition is being expressed by neighboring residents, however, and
possible legal hurdles have cropped up.
After considerable discussion and a 10-minute closed session, a
preliminary plat for the roughly 45-acre section on the southern part of
Campbell Ranch was approved unanimously.
Campbell Ranch is an 8,000-acre master-planned community east of N.M. 14
and north of Frost Road. The area was annexed by the town of Edgewood in
2001.
About 30 people attended the meeting, including Edgewood Mayor Howard
Calkins, Town Councilor Glenn Felton and state Rep. Kathy McCoy.
Sheldon Greer of GND Engineering presented the plat.
The proposed water supply for the development was one of the more
contentious issues discussed, and it is still unresolved.
Campbell Corp.'s current plan is to use water from a system in Sandia
Knolls, which is served by New Mexico American Water Service Company, or
NMAWSC.
The system has enough excess water to serve up to 750 residential units
in Campbell Ranch, according to a letter signed by Paul Risso, NMAWSC
general manager.
That claim was disputed by Janet Winchester-Silbaugh, a representative
of the Sandia Knolls Neighborhood Association, who also said it is not
certain the water company will pass the legal process necessary to provide
that water.
"We dispute NMAWSC's capability to serve the development until certain
conditions are met," she said to the commission, reading from a letter.
Before NMAWSC can supply water to Campbell Ranch, it must ask the PRC to
overturn a 2006 ruling that declared there are no excess water rights for
the system serving Sandia Knolls, she said.
The Office of the State Engineer also must agree to designate Campbell
Ranch as a place of use for the system, which may not be a simple matter,
according to some Sandia Knolls residents.
"It will be years before this is settled," McCoy, R-Cedar Crest, said in
an interview during the planning commission's closed session. McCoy, who
lives in Sandia Knolls, attended the meeting but did not comment publicly.
She added that the original ruling by the PRC came at great expense to
the neighborhood.
"We expended thousands of dollars so that water rights would stay in our
system," she said. "We thought this was done."
Risso, who was on hand to answer questions after the meeting, had a
different take. He said he thought it would take from six months to a year
and a half to resolve the water issue. He did mention, however, that if the
issue is challenged by Sandia Knolls residents it may take longer.
His company recently took over the water system, Risso said, and has
made a number of improvements over the last six months including fixing
several leaks.
In fact, the work was praised by several Sandia Knolls residents who
came to Monday's meeting to protest the proposal to supply water supply to
Campbell Ranch.
Risso said he was pleased with the turnout, and even the protests. He
said he would prefer for Sandia Knolls residents to have the opportunity to
influence the outcome and be informed of the issues.
"I'd much rather have everybody here from day one," he said.
Another hurdle the development still faces is its Public Improvement
District (PID).
The PID is Campbell's proposed method of providing services such as fire
protection, emergency medical and animal control services, and
infrastructure such as water and electricity to the area. It also protects
Edgewood from a legal obligation to provide those services.
David Henderson, who was Edgewood's attorney from 2002 until earlier
this year and has worked on the PID for a number of years, attended the
meeting as an adviser to the commission.
Henderson said he'd seen a draft of the PID agreement between Campbell
Corp. and Bernalillo County, but it is not yet finalized. He explained that
the lots cannot be sold until the agreement is finalized.
"I think (approving the plat) would turn the heat up on the PID pot," he
said.
Along with the PID and water, Greer discussed several other issues the
proposed development has addressed or is working on.
Grading and drainage, traffic studies, required traffic mitigation and
sewer treatment were discussed, but none of these issues created much of a
stir.
Initially the subdivision will use a lagoon system for wastewater
treatment, which generally involves a combination of septic tanks and a
holding pond, or lagoon, rather than a drain field.
The system is the first part of a staged investment ending in a sewer
treatment plant, Greer said.
After the planning commission's closed session, all members affirmed
under oath that they had not discussed how they would vote regarding the
proposed development.
In his motion to approve the plat, Commissioner Rey Fulwiler stipulated
that approval was contingent upon the town's development agreement (which
includes language about the PID) as well as all state statutes and local
ordinances, and that water issues be cleared through the PRC and State
Engineer.
The decision to approve was unanimous.
After the meeting Campbell Corp. president Robert Gately, who also
attended, said he felt the review process went well.
He also said the planned community will be something of a legacy for the
Campbell family.
"I think generally people are now starting to believe that we have a
strong commitment to quality," he said. |
Sandia Knolls
Neighborhood Association
Our Summary of
Campbell Ranch’s Plans
Based on a
Public meeting December 11, 2007
I
thought you all might to know what is planned for Campbell Ranch, so I
wrote this summary of a public meeting that was held last night. The
meeting was held at East Mountain High School, December 11, 2007. There
were perhaps 50 people attending the meeting, of whom 5 or so were from
the Knolls. (Thanks to those of you who attended.) This information is
from my hand-written notes (and sometimes the lights were out, making
writing interesting), and I apologize in advance if my notes are not
perfect.
Janet
Winchester-Silbaugh
The meeting was largely run
by Jim Lindeman, the Development Director of Campbell Corporation.
Robert Gately, President and a representative of Smith Engineering were
also at the meeting.
The town of Edgewood has
approved the Campbell Ranch Master Plan, which represents the first
phase of what will be the largest master-planned community in New
Mexico, eventually encompassing an area in excess of 28,000 acres.
The Campbell Ranch Master Plan envisions a mountain community of 4,023
homes, two golf courses, a resort, and commercial areas on 8,046 acres.
Roughly 50% of this land will be held as open space, including nearly
3,000 acres of Monte Largo, a mountain range that the Campbell Farming
Corporation, and an additional 900 acres of South Mountain.
Campbell plans 4 villages:
-
village 1, west of East Mountain High School,
-
village 2 east of Highway 14, between La
Madera Road and the first Paako entrance,
-
village 3, about where the trailer is east of
Highway 14, and
-
village 4, north along Highway 14.
Campbell wants to begin work on village 2 in 2008, including 92 home
sites and the commercial area, out of the total of 1400 home sites
“entitled” for village 2. Many homes may cost in the $300,000-$400,000
range and will be bound by design guidelines.
Each village will have a high concentration of housing in the center,
radiating out to areas of lower density at the edges. Each village will
also incorporate open space at the edges. Campbell has tried hard to
maintain the look of open space along Highway 14 with set-backs and open
space along roads.
Each village will have a “village green”, a commercial area. The
largest commercial area, about 30 acres, will be part of village 2. The
commercial areas will include things like a grocery store, and other
commercial services needed by a community of this size.
The maps showed 2 golf courses, a 9-hole course near village 2 and a
second course near village 3. It shows Monte Largo and South Mountain
as open space, as well as the riparian area along San Pedro Creek.
The audience asked numerous questions, and the answers below are what I
heard from the answers.
Where
will water come from? Campbell is
working on a combination of off-site and on-site water. They believe
they already have adequate water on-site for the first phase of
development (not clear if this was the first 92 home or village 2).
They have a letter from New Mexico Water Resources concerning using some
of the current Sandia Knolls water to support part of the frist phase of
development. It was not clear how many acre feet they were talking
about. They said that New Mexico Water Resources would be having a
meeting soon to explain what the agreement entails. No representative
of New Mexico Water Resources was present at the meeting.
Campbell said they have two wells: an old agricultural well, which was
used starting in 1941 for winter wheat, carrots and cattle. They did
not answer the question of how much water was used or the size of the
acreage farmed or number of cattle. The second well is a test well
drilled in the summer of 2007 near the south end of the property. They
said this well had a 1000-foot column of water and pumped 1000 acres a
minute (if I understood correctly). They are just now evaluating the
effect of pumping on nearby wells.
Campbell did not say how much water they would be using in the long
run, but that the rule of thumb for residential use is ¼ acre-feet per
housing unit.
Will
lots be sold to builders or individuals?
Campbell is working with a number of (unnamed)
builders who will build sections of homes. Quality standards are
included in the master plan. There are design guidelines (although it
is not clear what is in these guidelines).
Will
all roads come onto Highway 14, or will some tie in to the east?
All roads will go into Highway 14, although there may also be
development on the east side of Monte Largo (undefined at this point).
Where
will services come from? Campbell is
negotiating with Bernalillo County for services such as fire, EMT,
police and animal control.
Utilities
and Turquoise Trail. Many of the power
lines may be underground. The utility lines that already serve San
Pedro Creek overlook are already big enough to serve Campbell Ranch,
because they were anticipated when those lines were laid. Campbell will
soon begin talking to PNM about electrical power.
What
farming was done using the agricultural well? Acres, location, years of
operation, etc. Campbell said they
farmed winter wheat, carrots, cattle, starting in 1941 but said they
would look into the location, number of acres, and years farmed.
How
big is the village 2 commercial area?
31 acres, along Highway 14. Village 2 has by far the largest commercial
area. Campbell said they would control the commercial area and there
would not be 40-feet tall MacDonalds signs, a Costco or K-Mart. The
Master Plan indicates drive-thru’s, but Campbell said they do not
anticipate this type of commercial business. Village 1 has 10 acres of
commercial space. Village 4 has almost none.
Why
did Campbell seek annexation to Edgewood?
Campbell said it annexed to Edgewood because Bernalillo County did not
have a process to approve a master plan, but only had subdivision
process. This seemed to mean that Bernalillo county expected Campbell
to define many things in greater detail at the beginning of the process,
rather than letting the process evolve. Edgewood had a master plan
process, though it was fairly new.
Will
there be height restrictions? Yes, the
master plan has height restrictions.
Will
there be buffers between Campbell and other properties?
Yes, there will be a visual buffer open space along Highway 14, which
may be 150 to 300 feet wide. Robert Gately stated that he would use 500
feet buffers if needed. There will be a buffer between Campbell and
Sandia Knolls. Housing density along the southern border will be 1.4
housing units per acre.
San
Pedro Creek and the wild horse herd.
Campbell will maintain historic flow patterns in San Pedro Creek. They
are working on the issue of how to handle the wild herd of horses.
|
http://www.ose.state.nm.us/more_info_index.html New Mexico State Engineers
website with links to water information.
http://www.campbellcorporation.com/index.htm Homepage of Campbell
Corporation.
Our next great concern regarding water issues for The Sandia Knolls is the
development of the Campbell Ranch on our Northern boundary and the effect of the
Campbell Ranches water wells on our existing aquifer. This is an issue that we
will be following for a long time to come.
Sandia Knolls Resident,
I want to take this
letter to let everyone know that we have been very successful in our fund
raising campaigns. We have raised enough to have the fire hydrant to be
installed at the entrance to the Knolls, so now the fire department will
have a source of water closer than driving all the way to the post office to
refill their trucks. This will mean that in the event of a structural fire
in the Knolls or surrounding developments the overall response and follow-up
time will be more likely to save a residence. Please remember that in case
of a wildfire, having these resources are not necessarily going to save the
area. The best plan of action for all of us in wildfire situations is
planning for the worst, and practicing your plan so it will not give you any
surprises.
This kind of practice is just like fire drill practice in grade school.
The more you do it the less alarmed you will be in case of a real
emergency.
We still have a long way to go before the lawyer we all hired to protect
our water rights receives her final payment. In that vein, Janet, Pat, and
Viola are planning another community rummage sale at the church on Frost
Road. They are looking for any donations, goods to sell, etc., that you can
give that will help our efforts in raising funds.
Janet can be reached at
silbaugh@swcp.com , Viola at
bunchs@earthlink.net , and Pat at 286-8705. Please contact with anything
that you can provide that could help. This money is going to the lawyer to
pay her for the successful defense of out community water rights, which I
believe everyone should contribute to.
An update on the letter sent out for fund raising. We sent about 425
letters out, of which about 30 have been returned due to bad addresses.
Out of this total, we have received just over 80 responses. The cost of
the mailing was covered by my brother's business. This cost was just over
$165.00. The 80 or so replies allowed us to go forward with the hydrant, and
have some left over for the lawyer. But we have a long way to go. If
everyone in the community sent in the requested $50, we could raise over
$20,000. This would obviously pay all of our expenses, and we would have a
small sum left over that could be used towards building a bulletin board
sign at the entrance, another of our projects. I thank all of those who have
sent their contributions in to Sue Clark-Sorger.
But I am disappointed that more residents do not see the value in the
saving of the water rights, and feel that each of us should make an effort
to get our non participating neighbors to help. The neighborhood association
has no interest in becoming a organization that tells each of you how you
have to live and play on your property. But I believe the causes that we
have supported are worthy of your support, as well as your neighbors. Please
help us in our efforts.
Charles Ramirez from Bernalillo County Zoning Enforcement has informed me
that BC will be having a FREE clean-up day in October for the residents of
the Knolls. Just like the clean-up days last year, you will be able to haul
all your unwanted wood, junk, paints, gas, and anything else to the county
yard next to the fire station on Frost Road. The date has not been
finalized, and I will keep you posted when Charles lets me know. This will
be an ideal opportunity to clear out some of the stuff that accumulates
around the house. I know that I have a bunch of stuff that I need to haul.
Slowly but surely we are making our community a little less of a fire
hazard. Keep up the good work. Remember, community rummage sale: Saturday, September 23, 9 am - 3 pm.
All leftover goods will be donated to the Talking Talons Thrift Store.
Contact Janet, Viola, or Pat with donations, volunteer help, or anything
else that you can contribute. Thanks, John Helmich
SKNA News; From John Helmich
Kathy McCoy (Vice President of SKNA) and I are exploring the
installation of a fire hydrant at the entrance to the Knolls. John Jones,
the Entranosa Water Company head administrator, has already informed me that
Entranosa Water is willing to let us place the hydrant on their water line
that parallels Frost Road. The reason we need to use their water line is
because no water line within the Knolls is large enough to supply a fire
truck at the water flow rate the fire department needs during an emergency.
So the first hurdle has been cleared. Kathy is in touch with Bernalillo
County to find out if there is any money available to pay for the
installation of the hydrant. It will take about $3000 for this and since we
can't even pay the lawyer, we obviously have no money for this also.
Breaking News!! From John Helmich
Great news! Our lawyer has informed me that we have won! The PRC
hearing examiner has ruled that ALL the paper water rights need to be
retained within the utility, meaning that no water rights can be sold as
surplus. The examiner has ruled that as far as she is concerned all the water
rights that IUC possesses must be kept by the utility for the future development
of Sandia Knolls and the other small development that IUC supplies. Of course,
this is not the full PRC ruling, but from what I have been told, the examiner's
recommendations are rarely overturned or reversed. Be aware that the appeals
process is still in play, so this is just the first but most important
step in our drive to make sure our community water availability does not
disappear. So our decision to retain the lawyer has produced positive results.
In fact, better than I or she had expected. All the more reason that we need to
show our thanks to her by getting her paid.
On that note, I am trying to organize a rummage sale for sometime in May
(hopefully) at the community church frontage area along Frost Road. I need
everyone to make some sort of commitment, either in goods that they would like
to donate, or in their time, to make this event happen. Please let me know ASAP
what you can do. We need to maximize the number of goods, and minimize
volunteers helping sell the goods, since too many people helping does not pay
the lawyer's fee for her services rendered.
From Earlier SKNA E-Mail
What we need to do now regarding the on-going water issues before the PRC.
Although I have not kept everyone up to date on this, things are moving forward.
In October during the meeting about the water situation, the community
overwhelmingly decided that we would hire a lawyer to protect our interests in
the PRC hearing about the sale of IUC. During the past few months the PRC held
meetings at which testimony was made regarding water rates, excess water rights,
and setting acre feet of water per household. The lawyer that we retained hired
an expert on the water surplus issue, and she testified on our behalf. I
attended this hearing along with Chris Bettman, one of your neighbors. The
testimony centered on what level the PRC should set for IUC to retain water
rights for households that they service, primarily Sandia Knolls residents. To
clarify, IUC was given approximately 325 acre feet of water rights that they
could pump and sell to their customers. Presently, they are pumping about 0.25
acre feet per household to their customers. If you assume that all their
customers are within the development, this means that presently they are
actually using about 87.5 acre feet of water rights (assuming 350 homes as
customers.) The issue before the PRC is whether or not IUC can sell the balance
of their water rights, and also set what they are required to deliver to Sandia
Knolls residents at 0.25 acre feet per year. Our lawyer and our expert she hired
testified that we feel that this limit is much too low, and should be set at 0.6
acre feet per year per household. If we use the same 350 homes estimate, this
means that our lawyer is asking the PRC to make IUC retain a minimum of 210 acre
feet of water rights for sale to Sandia Knolls. In conjunction with that,
another important fact needed to be considered. There are potentially over 500
lots in Sandia Knolls that can be built on, so the actual acre feet of water
that would need to be retained by the utility is closer to 300 acre feet of
water rights to support the future of the Knolls. Our lawyer is trying to
prevent the setting of required water rights at the unrealistic level of 0.25
acre feet. I believe that the PRC will probably set the number somewhere between
0.25 and what we asked for,0.6 acre feet. But the reality is that there is no
guarantee of this. We have made it possible that this could happen by having our
lawyer bring our interests before the PRC. It is my belief that is we had not
done this, the PRC would have ruled on this issue for the water utility, and set
our water rights at the 0.25 level. But because you in the community showed an
interest in what is happening, we may have some influence in the final outcome.
The PRC will be deliberating within the next few weeks on this, so we should be
getting word of a decision soon.
|